Head to head

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on 4 of the 4 benchmarks both models publish. The widest gap is on SWE-bench Pro, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads by 25.8 points. DeepSeek V4 Pro has open weights, so unlike Claude Fable 5.1 you can run it on your own GPU with no per-token fees.

Shared benchmarks

Raw published scores; the higher score on each row is highlighted. LMArena Elo is a human-preference vote and is not counted as a win.

  • GPQA Diamond
    90.193.7

    V4-Pro (Preview) Max, pass@1GPQA Diamond; AA independent run (Max, Default Fallback)

  • Humanity's Last Exam
    42.760.9

    V4-Pro-0813, no toolsHumanity's Last Exam, no tools; max effort

  • Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
    60.065.0

    V4-Pro-0813, with toolsHumanity's Last Exam, with tools; max effort (Opus 5.5 system card lists Fable 5.1 at 65.6%)

  • SWE-bench Pro
    55.481.2

    V4-Pro (Preview) Max, resolvedSWE-bench Pro; adaptive thinking max effort; avg of 5 trials

  • LMArena Text Elo · not counted
    14651504

    DeepSeek-V4-Pro (High, 20260813), ±7, board dated 2026-10-27LMArena Text, Overall; snapshot Oct 27, 2026; Claude Fable 5.1 (Max); +/-6

Should you pick DeepSeek V4 Pro or Claude Fable 5.1?

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro if…

  • You need to self-host: keep prompts and data on your own GPU, avoid per-token fees, or fine-tune the weights.
  • You need fast responses: about 94 tokens per second through APIs, against 71.
  • Cost matters: $3.96 per million output tokens against $50.00.

Pick Claude Fable 5.1 if…

  • You care most about GPQA Diamond, Humanity's Last Exam, Humanity's Last Exam (with tools), where it scores at least 2 points higher.
  • You want a managed API and would rather not run or pay for GPUs yourself.
  • People prefer its answers in blind chats: LMArena Elo 1504 against 1465.

Hardware and cost to run

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Even at 4-bit it needs about 1.1 TB (8× H200 (1,128 GB)), well beyond a home workstation, so most people run it on rented multi-GPU servers. Full BF16 precision needs about 3.7 TB (Multiple nodes (over 1.1 TB)).

Full GPU memory table for DeepSeek V4 Pro

Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1 is only available through Anthropic's API, so it cannot be self-hosted; it costs $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens.

Category profile

Category index uses every test each model reports, not only the shared ones.

ReasoningCodingAgenticKnowledge
DeepSeek V4 ProClaude Fable 5.1
Reasoning86.796.1
Coding89.484.7
Agentic88.192.9
Knowledge100.0—

Specs side by side

DeepSeek V4 ProClaude Fable 5.1
LabDeepSeekAnthropic
WeightsOpenAPI only
Released2026-08-132026-09-01
Parameters1.6T total, 49B active (MoE)—
Context1M1M
LicenseMIT—
4-bit memory1.1 TB · 8× H200 (1,128 GB)—
API price$1.32 in / $3.96 out per 1M tokens$10.00 in / $50.00 out per 1M tokens
API speed94 tok/s71 tok/s

Related comparisons

Sources

ModelTestScoreSettingSource
DeepSeek V4 ProGPQA Diamond90.1V4-Pro (Preview) Max, pass@1Hugging Face model card (DeepSeek-V4-Pro)
Claude Fable 5.1GPQA Diamond93.7GPQA Diamond; AA independent run (Max, Default Fallback)Artificial Analysis
DeepSeek V4 ProHumanity's Last Exam42.7V4-Pro-0813, no toolsHugging Face model card (DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813)
Claude Fable 5.1Humanity's Last Exam60.9Humanity's Last Exam, no tools; max effortAnthropic Claude Fable 5.1 / Mythos 5.1 System Card (Table 8.1.A)
DeepSeek V4 ProHumanity's Last Exam (with tools)60.0V4-Pro-0813, with toolsHugging Face model card (DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813)
Claude Fable 5.1Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)65.0Humanity's Last Exam, with tools; max effort (Opus 5.5 system card lists Fable 5.1 at 65.6%)Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 / Mythos 5.1 System Card (Table 8.1.A)
DeepSeek V4 ProSWE-bench Pro55.4V4-Pro (Preview) Max, resolvedHugging Face model card (DeepSeek-V4-Pro)
Claude Fable 5.1SWE-bench Pro81.2SWE-bench Pro; adaptive thinking max effort; avg of 5 trialsAnthropic Claude Fable 5.1 / Mythos 5.1 System Card (Table 8.1.A / sec 8.2)
DeepSeek V4 ProLMArena Text Elo1465DeepSeek-V4-Pro (High, 20260813), ±7, board dated 2026-10-27LMArena (arena.ai) text leaderboard
Claude Fable 5.1LMArena Text Elo1504LMArena Text, Overall; snapshot Oct 27, 2026; Claude Fable 5.1 (Max); +/-6LMArena (arena.ai) Text leaderboard

Scores are published results from model cards, lab reports, and public leaderboards, each linked to its source. Settings such as thinking mode or test version differ between sources and are shown next to each score. OpenLLM Buddy catalog models are uncensored fine-tunes; their scores are those of the official base model. Data collected 2026-10-30. How the index works